Latest posts
-
The UK Is Moving Automated Decision-Making Away From the EU Model
The UK’s newer approach to automated decision-making looks more permissive than the classic Article 22 model, which makes cross-border AI governance harder to unify.
-
Illinois Is Turning AI in Employment Into a Notice and Recordkeeping Problem
Illinois is showing where employment AI regulation is headed: broad notice triggers, recordkeeping pressure, and closer scrutiny of how automated tools influence employment decisions.
-
Connecticut’s SB 5 Shows How Far a State Can Push on AI Governance
Connecticut’s SB 5 looks less like a niche AI bill and more like a broad governance framework, adding pressure to the growing state-by-state compliance patchwork.
-
Colorado Rewrites Its AI Law Before It Fully Takes Hold
Colorado’s revised AI bill narrows the focus to automated decision-making technology, delays the effective date to 2027, and pushes companies toward documentation, notice, and human review.
-
Your AI Prompts May Not Be Privileged
AI prompts are not automatically privileged. Legal teams should use approved enterprise AI environments, clear prompt rules, and the right workflow for sensitive work.
-
The EU AI Act Priorities Just Shifted Again
The EU AI Act timetable shifted again in May 2026. Here’s what still appears to take effect in 2026, what appears delayed, and how legal teams should reset compliance priorities.
-
Connecticut’s New AI Law Is a Practical Warning for Employers and AI Product Teams
What Connecticut’s new AI law signals for employers, product teams, and legal teams trying to get ahead of practical state-level regulation.